Disrupting Frivolous Defenses

نویسندگان

چکیده

Judge Milton I. Shadur was a disrupter of frivolous defenses. In 2018, died at the age 93 after 37 years as judge United States District Court for Northern Illinois. Sua sponte, reviewed civil answers, and disrupted pleading Sponte Shadur—as some lawyers called him—rejected answers that departed from or ignored Rule 8 Federal Rules Civil Procedure. In 2001, issued an Appendix to order in State Farm v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276 (N.D. Ill. 2001) with his expectations regarding how defense were answer according As makes clear, disallowed pleaders dodge by 1) claiming allegation legal conclusion, 2) documents speak themselves; 3) demanding strict proof. also expected affirmative defenses (Or ADs, he them) would be true attorneys support foundational predicate facts. The Appendix, now 20 old, is living rich life. Judges have cited Shadur’s appendix 233 times. Litigants case 452 times trial-court motions filings well 14 appellate matters. Westlaw reports 52 citations secondary sources another 13 directory West calls “Practical Law.” After presenting minibiography Shadur, backstory gloss on this article tracks use federal judges throughout States. Specifically, focuses conclusions, speaking documents, The organizes cases circuit. organization should interesting academics useful preparing F.R.C.P. 12 strike defenses, deem allegations admitted, more definite statement. first covers citation himself, next Illinois colleagues, then within broader Seventh Circuit, finally outside Circuit. Last are few state courts finishing, though, epitome which rule change Arizona Supreme year death. Arizona’s aligns Appendix. This meshes empirical analysis my related Frivolous Defenses. piece, I examine car-crash complaints Colorado, where live, teach, practiced law. For 298 lawsuits, retrieved read corresponding 356 number than because suits had multiple defendants. Defenses examines departures Colorado’s using, among other things, analysis. I welcome comment suggestions professors, attorneys, concerning either these articles.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Effect of Frivolous Lawsuits on the Settlement of Litigation

It is commonly alleged that a substantial proportion of lawsuits are frivolous and are filed only for their nuisance value. This paper models settlement bargaining in the presence of frivolous suits as a game of asymmetric information, where the plaintiff knows the true merits of his claim, and the defendant does not, apart from any inferences he can draw from the fact of suit. When there is fr...

متن کامل

How David beat Goliath: History of physicians fighting frivolous lawsuits

Legal and medical professions are intertwined in an intimate and complex relationship. Medical malpractice arguably constitutes the biggest point of contention between the two professions. While a significant proportion of medical malpractice complaints are not frivolous and are based on appropriate research and screening criteria, most of these complaints are ultimately settled or taken to tri...

متن کامل

Adversarial Example Defenses: Ensembles of Weak Defenses are not Strong

Ongoing research has proposed several methods to defend neural networks against adversarial examples, many of which researchers have shown to be ineffective. We ask whether a strong defense can be created by combining multiple (possibly weak) defenses. To answer this question, we study three defenses that follow this approach. Two of these are recently proposed defenses that intentionally combi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1556-5068']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805181